The Dark Side of Eclipses

Religion & Spirituality

synopsis

Synopsis

Our ancestors didn't understand why eclipses happened, but their meaning was clear: The gods were not happy. Ancient Greeks figured out the mechanics sufficiently to predict their occurrence.

Why bother if they were meaningless?

The "Enlightenment" threw anything unproven in a laboratory based on 18th Century science out the window as "myth and superstition," such as astrology.

If so, why did certain elite groups such as the Rosicrucians and Catholic Church continue to practice it? A devious move, perhaps, to keep this powerful tool out of the hands of the common man? Why else do they claim, "Millionaires don't use astrology but billionaires do?"

Ignoring the truth doesn't change the truth. The heavens still speak. The Holy Bible states the stars and planets were given "for times and for seasons." God hasn't changed and neither has His promise.

Sadly, even churches no longer pay attention, but condemn astrology as "of the devil."

How can God's creations be from the devil? Who would say that other than the devil himself?

Biblical prophecies are corroborated by similar predictions from other religions and indigenous peoples. They're coming to pass at an astounding rate, though the dumbed-down masses remain oblivious to their importance.

The Great American Eclipse in 2017 was visible from coast to coast. Its symbolism indicates a country divided. In October 2023 another solar eclipse path crossed the country with another coming in April 2024 that will cross them both.

What did the October 2023 eclipse tell us? Its path paralleled the U.S. Southern Border. Did it implicate the immigration crisis?

What will the total eclipse on April 8, 2024 deliver? The paths of all three form two ominous "Xs" on the United States. Do these figurative crosshairs indicate God has had enough?

Discover how these "signs in the heavens" predict the downfall of the United States as physicist and professional astrologer, Marcha "Whobeda" Fox, interprets their symbolism alongside subsequent events.

Buckle up, America. You ain't see nothin' yet.

bio

Author Biography

Marcha Fox’s passion for science fiction began as a child. Her determination to write in that genre knew no bounds, such that she even went back to college in her 30s to obtain a bachelor’s of science degree in physics, after which she spent over 20 years working at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. Science and engineering experience notwithstanding, it’s the unexplained mysteries of the cosmos, such as the concept of a universal consciousness, which provide the setting for Beyond the Hidden Sky, first volume of a four-part series. Centered on the Brightstar family who has been torn apart by a storm of political and scientific intrigue, they will stop at nothing until they are reunited.

website

Author Insight

Do You Speak Legalese?

If someone came up to you and said they were going to kill you in a foreign tongue you didn't understand, you'd have no idea what it meant. Not understanding the language government uses in legislation is much the same. They hide their intent in plain sight because: 1) Most people don't slog through hundreds of pages of this rot; and 2) Even if they did, they're unlikely to recognize what it actually means. Here is an example of that deception. Back in 2012, a bill was signed that made it legal for the press and government to lie to you. How much has the USA and world in general gone downhill since that time? This book is not about astronomy or astrology. It's about what eclipses have been telling us for decades.

Book Excerpt

The Dark Side of Eclipses

Memes and other questionable material implicate H.R.4310 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, a bill Obama signed in 2012, as making it legal for the press to lie to the American people. According to snopes.com, this was not true. Being skeptical of anything they say since they've been known to lie before (taking advantage of this bill, too, no doubt), I decided to read it myself.

Or I might add, try.

My eyes glazed over trying to slog through this lengthy bill, most of which relates to military funding and policies, but I did find a few sections that did just that. Legislative language is not always easy for someone without legal training to fully understand, particularly any implications that are purposely cloaked in legalese.

From what I understand, the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 that followed World War II made it illegal to impose propaganda on the American people. The big caveat, however, was that doing so in other countries to preserve or possibly improve America's image was acceptable. Here is what it states in H.R. 4310, Section 1078:

(Sec. 1078) Revises provisions of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 authorizing the Secretary of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to provide for the preparation and dissemination of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, including about its people and policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors.

Authorizes the Secretary and the Board to make available in the United States motion pictures, films, video, audio, and other materials disseminated abroad pursuant to such Act, the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, the Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act, or the Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act. Amends the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 to remove statutory limitations on the ability of the Board and the State Department to provide information about their activities to the media, the public, or Congress. [Emphasis added.]

"Statutory limitations" could easily relate to the Smith-Mundt Act that prohibited propaganda much less overt lying.

If you're so inclined to search the bill yourself, have at it. You can find it on the government website:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/4310

If the media was granted permission to lie, this gave them license to get as creative as they wanted with news stories. The more sensational, the better has always been the case to draw readers or an audience, but now there were no limits or restrictions to assure accurate reporting.

It used to be that papers like The National Enquirer were obviously comprised of fiction. They actually paid quite well for these stories, but anyone with the intelligence of a turnip knew the majority were fake.

Now the mainstream media, that far too many people continue to trust, is in that same category.

Welcome to the world of fake news!