The New School Nazis: It's Your Actions that Define You

New School Nazis UNRAVELING the CLOTH 

Mealy-Mouthed and Proud

Why are women never portrayed as sexist, and blacks never portrayed as racist?

Google search result:

“The idea that women are never portrayed as sexist and Black people are never portrayed as racist in media and society is complex and subject to debate.”

Not only is the standard disclaimer of “complex” used, this equivocating statement refuses to admit to any factual basis for the question. Their “subject to debate” phrase is what I refer to as a “shelving” technique: putting aside those questions and motives that they can’t ignore, but don’t want to deal with.

“In summary, the perception that women and Black people are never portrayed as sexist or racist is a generalization that may overlook the complexities of media representation and the power dynamics at play.”

Wow! It’s an equivocation motherlode [“Equivocation” is the use of ambiguous language to conceal the truth or to avoid committing oneself]. Let’s unpack it:

“Perception”: a belief or opinion. “Generalization”: a statement in which you say or write that something is true all of the time when it is only true some of the time. “Overlook”: to fail to notice something. “Complexities”: features of something that make it difficult to understand or find an answer to.

That’s a whole lot of fancy dancing in response to a straightforward question – but don’t get confused by the footwork: just listen for the tune they’re dancing to.

The search responses for other questions are similar in content:

“It is important to clarify that the category "non-Hispanic" is not explicitly used to implement policies of discrimination.” – “this classification doesn't define or diminish a person's heritage beyond the context of its specific use”

“In essence, while affirmative action policies are not inherently secret, the details of their implementation can be sensitive and sometimes not fully disclosed due to legal, political, and practical considerations.”

These search responses all minimize arguments that these acts are acts of discrimination; however, the arguments that support those same acts are treated differently: all animus and self-interest are washed away in an apologistic cleansing – Leading to a conclusion that any debate is no more than an obstructive quibbling.

It was Google’s AI Overview that generated these quoted statements. Their AI Overview is placed first on the search results, and therefore is the most viewed and the most used.

The equivocating messages and responses in their AI results go a long way towards showing a policy of evasiveness when answering clear cut questions on “social justice” subjects.

Although Artificial Intelligence proponents admit that; “AI algorithms can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if they are trained on biased data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcome” – all serious questions of the ethics and motives of the human’s behind how our AI actually functions are merely “subject to debate.”

Abraham Lincoln said: “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.”

I’m sure that he would feel the same about anyone arguing for the diminishment of human worth.